Tinubu & Facts The Full List is out … Be Your own INEC PEPT & Conscience
We’re trivialising what
@officialABAT
did by thinking it’s Certificate forgery, it’s actually an ‘Identity theft’
It’s more serious than we think and absolutely disgraceful
Government College Lagos was founded in 1974. Whoever claimed they graduated from there in 1970, is a FRAUD!
1. Bola .A. Tinubu who owned the CSU admission was a woman.
2. Bola Tinubu who attended CSU was born in 1954, not 1952.
3. The certificate tendered to INEC is different from those issued by the CSU.
More revelations:
Frame 1: the Original Chicago State University certificate design in 1978/1979.
Frame 2: the Original Chicago State University certificate design in 1998/1998.
Frame 3: what Tinubu submitted as his certificate from 1979. At a closer look, you’d see that the logo on the 2003 certificate is similar to Tinubu’s certificate logo! The format is incorrect and the degree title wasn’t properly worded.
Lastly, Frame 4: The logo on Tinubu’s certificate does not match the original logo from CSU. His own is missing “1867” below the triangle as seen here.
No credibility,
No consistency,
No integrity.
3 different seals on the certificates awarded in the same year?
CSU is the reason for all these up and down arguments.
There are 3 certificates usually issued to students at different time
i) Original certificates
ii) Replacement Certificate
iii) X certificate (find out).
The problem is from CSU.
Anyone would challenge these certificates any day.
In one of the court proceedings, CSU admitted that they issued a duplicate certificate to Tinubu after he reported that his original certificate was lost.
Yes, the replacement certificate was not supposed to have the same template with the original but there’s supposed to be a label with “Replacement certificate”, “Reissued Certificate”, “Replica Certificate”, “Duplicate Certificate” etc whether at the top or bottom of the certificate copy, and then the date it was reissued. By so doing, considering the fact that academic certificates possess the values of credibility, consistency and integrity, no one would ever suspect anything when they see differences in templates, seals, signatories or dates.
If these were done in Tinubu’s replacement copy, nobody would have accused him of using a forged certificate.
These are standards which must be met. Certificates are not tissue papers. They possess integrity just like our currency.
Again, the copy given to Atiku was not supposed to be a replacement copy, it’s supposed to be the X document I said you should find out earlier.
Standards are set to protect integrity, consistency and credibility.
The inconsistency was the reason their representative could not authenticate their documents in court.
If CSU had labeled the Replacement certificate, nobody would have been concerned about the seal there or the difference in template design but they made everyone assume they’re copies of the original. Also, they failed to label the copy issued to Atiku or the issuance date.
One can’t even tell which one is their original or replacement copy or the X copy.
Standards are set to prevent this kind of confusion.
It’s unfortunate.
As it is, CSU has proven there’s no consistency in theIr documents and as such, it’s better for Atiku to forget about the case.
I’m not impressed with CSU for not maintaining standards.
You can’t accuse PBAT of anything further after CSU has already shown the world that their certificates do not have any integrity.
This is just too embarrassing. They should apologize to President Tinubu, Atiku and all of us.
@ChicagoState
needs to improve on their certificates management and ensure those fonts are legible. They’re too tiny and illegible
<p>The post Tinubu & Facts The Full List is out … Be Your own INEC PEPT & Conscience first appeared on SWORDSPRESS.COM.</p>
