Kanayo O Kanayo : Review Marvel’s Harry Potter – Doctor Strange vs The Nigerian Jazzman Native Doctor – How White people Turn their Wizards & Witches into Heroes and The Black Man’s Hero IS EVIL !
Dormamu ( Doctor Strange’s Main Antagonist in the Comics)
i’ve come to bargain , i am a Nigerian Jazzman aka Native Doctor ( yeah we got our own doctor strange) Babalawo,Alfa,Juju Man , Okhue Dodo or Medicine man Shaman (shame on me )
i love goissips they circulate even quicker than yahoo yahoo spam email .. but super gossips lol these are the super heroes ! some are faster than a speeding train able to jump with a fake story many storeys high with a single bound , and their impacts more powerfil than a locomotive with more lies even real liars disdian .
that there are multiverses implies there are multiple eternitys begins marvel and hollywoods now open war against the thou shal nots in theBible .
Thanos was totally evil but at least he was on a physical realm and di not even know about time travel !
Gay xters as Heroines
Heroes and villians basically using the same dark magic
and the solid loophole that wanda could decieve her own self shows the silliness of her so called Mega powers and we havent even seen a dormaamu demon Stranges main antagonist in the comics in full action yet
i bet thats the next movie plot…
and guess what it made over 900millin dollars
means many people have seen it
and we think hollywood and marvel have not come to bargain ?
for our kids for our realities for our Faiths
i hear even unbelievers in Saudi Arabia banned it
in the last days …
One cannot help but wonder, then, what might be learned about con-
temporary North American values from the heroes and superheroes associated
with the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU). As of 2019, the MCU spans 23
films that have collectively grossed about $22 billion worldwide. Each film is
part of a larger ‘phase’, comprising several films focused on individual char-
acters, who eventually team up to battle a world or even galaxy-spanning
threat. Writing in Salon, Matthew Rozsa (2019) describes the MCU as ‘the
greatest and most influential franchise of the decade [2010s] – not just in
film, but in other forms of media’ (n.p.). Indeed, there are MCU TV shows,
officially-licensed soundtrack albums, tie-in comics, and, of course, a plethora
of scholarly works devoted to exploring every nuance of the franchise. Dozens
of heroes have been introduced by the MCU, but none, perhaps, is more
representative of the franchise as a whole than the first one: Iron Man/Tony
Stark, who has been played in all of the films by Robert Downey Jr. ‘[Stark]
has been the lodestone in this cinematic world’, Alex McLevy (2018) writes,
‘the centerpiece around which all other characters have aggregated ever since
the first Iron Man (2008) launched the Marvel Cinematic Universe’ (n.p.).
Clearly Iron Man is finished in the MCU and Strangly Enough A Dcotor Strange has Taken Over
Easy names Christian Name Steven Strange . The Antithesis of one Anthony Stark now an overused Icon
Welcome Steven Bye Bye Tech Heroes wiht AI Robots Suits . Arrive the Magical Cloaks & Occultic Daggers Millenials . The Age of Potterism & Vampiric Twilights Re Awaken !
Scarlet Witch Might Finally Be the Most Powerful Entity in the MCU but she is too dumb to know she RALLY doesnt have 2 kids ? or couldnt she make those kids love her ?
agamotto aginomoto ? you say agamotto i say aginomoto a popular nigerian food spice lol
3rd eyes or what you will some themes we noticed
We are no strangers on Marvel Studios Ability to turn mainstream cultures obsolete nd sneak new ideas and genres to the unsuspecting public
Wizards Aliens LGBT Harry poter
900 million dollars
Benedict Cumberbatch and Benedict Wong ( yeah they both have the same first names magical coincidenc or ? Occultic Predestination ) star in a scene from the movie “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness.” The Catholic News
YOU WOULD ACTUALLY EXPECT MANY CATHOLIC WEBSITES TO CONDEMN THIS MOVIE OUTRIGHT
https://www.catholicregister.org/features/arts/item/23627-doctor-strange-offers-a-taste-of-spiritual-medicine
[spoilers] The New Dr Strange Movie is One of the Most Anti-Catholic Movies I’ve Seen. from Catholicism
If OP doesn’t mind, I’d like to take this opportunity to share with you all an article I wrote on the “post-modern values” of the MCU:
This paper was published last year in a (very expensive) edited collection. It may not be completely kosher for me to share the article with you all this way, but I doubt the publisher will care enough one way or the other. Anyway, I’ll take down the link in a day or two.
I wrote the article after watching all the way through Phase Three, so it doesn’t address any of the newer shows or films. And I still haven’t seen Dr. Strange in the Multiverse of Madness … but I have seen Black Widow, Shang-chi, and The Eternals, and I do believe OP is right to be skeptical of this film’s sympathy towards Christian values (and Catholicism more specifically). There hasn’t been much of that in the franchise as a whole, and no one involved with Dr. Strange would lead me to believe it does anything more but deal with resurrection or sacrifice in the usual ironic and skeptical manner.
These are broad themes that have become so embedded in Western culture and the standard “hero’s journey” of modern mythopoeia that I think one has to go beyond merely pointing out their existence in a certain text to make the argument that that text reflects a genuinely Christian outlook. But, not haven’t seen the film in question, I admit I may be wrong about this one!
I’ve been seeing these kinds of takes a lot from fellow Catholics and it’s honestly baffling. There is so much wrong with this take. I found the movie to be incredibly well done and ALSO to have quite a good message. In fact in many ways I think this movie affirms Catholic truths in the following ways:
-
The film depicts the darkhold as the devil preying on humans in their most vulnerable state and driving them to do bad things. At the end of Wandavision, Wanda is heartbroken after realizing vision is truly gone and her children do not exist. She’s grieving, and the darkhold takes advantage of her pain and seizes onto it, leading her to be corrupted into Scarlet Witch.
-
The film’s moral theme/message seems to me to be that happiness and peace is found in grounding yourself in reality and having gratitude, rather than wanting to change who you are or pretend you are something you aren’t. Wanda wants to pretend she’s a mom and she’s willing to take control of another universe’s Wanda to do so. But at the end of the day those will never be her kids. Wanda comes to accept that at the end.
-
The darkhold corrupts even the best of us. Doctor Strange uses the dark hold to defeat Wanda, but it comes at a cost. As we see at the end, doctor strange grows an eye. Using dark magic comes at a toll, just as flirting with sin and the devil comes at a toll.
To address your specific concerns, no I do not think the filmmakers were attempting to make doctor strange a messiah, I find that ridiculous. The turning water to wine at the wedding was simply a joke and isn’t meant to be any more than that. Strange taking control of his dead body has nothing to do with a ressurection. Nobody is being ressurected, the body is simply an avatar he uses to access his world. And no Wanda does not commit suicide, this is never confirmed at all. And knowing Marvel I guarantee she’s still alive. If anything, the only “anti-catholic” part of this movie is America Chavez’ gay pride pin. Other than that, I think most of your critiques of this are wildly farfetched.
The first Marvel movie that made me deeply spiritually uncomfortable
Negative—This is the first Marvel movie that made me deeply spiritually uncomfortable, because the “magic” it contains veers into occult / satanic territory (necromancy, possession, and harnessing demons to do “good”). And it’s not just the villain doing these things, but also the hero. Rather than fight evil magic with good magic, Strange uses the same “evil” spells as the villain to defeat them—by opening a spell book he knows is evil, and using one of its spells to possess a dead body and control the demons in the “in-between” world.
Seeing his decaying zombie corpse march into a pagan temple to do battle against the villain with multiple demonic arms coming out of his back sent a cold chill over me. By making Strange into a Necromancer, Marvel is blurring the lines between Good and Evil and suggesting the end justifies the means if your intentions are “good.” But evil is always evil.
As Jesus said, you cannot cast out one demon with another. What is wicked and forbidden will never be good. It was a super creepy and spiritually unsettling twist in a movie that had been, before that, dark but brilliantly entertaining. It was positively demonic at the end.
Moral rating: Extremely Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 5
Depressing, gross, horror-filled with non-stop demonic imagery
Moral rating: Extremely Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 3
Horrible images and content that once it began did not stop until the movie ended
Negative—I chose to spend my Mother’s Day at the movies with my three sons and was looking forward to a fun comedic, action packed and heartfelt Marvel adventure like we had experienced so many times before. Unfortunately it was the exact opposite. I spent the second half of the movie telling my boys to cover their eyes, while I looked around at the many small children that appeared terrified as they watched the horrible images and content that once it began did not stop until the movie ended! I wish someone had warned me against going to see this movie which is why I am leaving this review. I do not watch horror movies and would never subject my children to a movie like this knowingly.
It is a movie filled with graphic horror images, witchcraft, satanic rituals, bloodshed, violent images of killing and many jump scares which have no place in a film marketed towards children and youth. There is also the addition of Disney’s seemingly highest political priority (which again has no place in a children’s film) and that’s to push the LGB… agenda on our children by giving “America” the main female character two moms. It is a completely unnecessary addition to the film other then to undermine the sanctity of God’s plan for the family which is to have a mom and a dad.
I have and will continue to speak out against this movie so it will not take more Christian families hard earned resources that can be spent on movies that are deserving of our time and money.
Moral rating: Extremely Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 4
Negative—It is very sad that we can not trust the Disney company anymore to be family friendly and safe for viewing. They are actively promoting an anti-God, anti-Judeo-Christian worldview in their movies. They are a part of the world system with Satan at its helm that has aligned itself against God.
The warning I think of by the Lord Himself is found in Mark 9:42—“Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it is better for him (read Disney Co.) if a heavy millstone is hung around his neck, and he is thrown into the sea”.
There is still time to repent. God is loving and merciful and forgiving.
PLEASE share your observations and insights to be posted below via facebook
…One of the year’s worst… Everything, including the overabundance of CGI, is ugly as sin. … [1/4]
…The film feels like a collection of ideas that never add up. …
…“Doctor Strange and the Multiverse of Madness” is a ride, a head trip, a CGI horror jam, a what-is-reality Marvel brainteaser and, at moments, a bit of an ordeal. It’s a somewhat engaging mess, but a mess all the same. …
…There may be a universe in which I feel the barest thread of emotional connection to even one thing that happens during the 126 minutes of loud, smeary nonsense that is Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. But I doubt it. …
…a bizarro plot that serves up philosophical, ethical and spiritual mind games in between the sometimes repetitive but slick and exhilarating action sequences, this is one of the weirder Marvel movies yet. …
…a new low for Marvel’s digital gloop factory… sends Benedict Cumberbatch across multiple planes of existence – to little end… [2/5]
…Marvel sequel kicks off with relentless exposition, before buckling further and further under the weight of its magical MacGuffins… It turns out that the point of the multiverse, and of Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, isn’t its creative potential. It’s its cameos. A million universes could exist, and they’d all contain surprise appearances by people and things fans can hoot and holler over, before being purchased as toys on the way out of the cinema. … [2/5]
…The Multiverse idea gets further beaten to death… This isn’t one of the best movies of this genre. But when at its best, it takes Marvel places it’s been entirely too timid to go before, and I’m NOT talking about this endlessly flogged “multiverse” business. … [2½/4]
…There isn’t much of a love story here. There isn’t much of anything, even as there’s too much of everything. …
A barrage of special effects, splashes of horror, and nothing up its sleeve… the real trick is making the audience care. For all of Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness’s mind-bending universe jumping, that particular magic never manages to arrive in the theater. …
SEARCH ON GOOGLE DOCTOR STRANGE CATHOLICS AND SEE
Benedict Cum is Buddhist
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
Benedict Cumberbatch and Benedict Wong star in a scene from the movie “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness.” The Catholic News Service classification is A-III — adults. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG-13 — parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13. (CNS photo/Marvel Studios)
By: Joseph McAleer
Date: May 6, 2022
Movie Ratings: PG-13
Movie Classification: A-III
NEW YORK (CNS) — The award for the most appropriate film title of 2022 goes to “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness” (Disney). Truly, this is a maddening, multidimensional, decidedly strange, yet typically “Marvel”-ous movie based on the comic book series.
Taken at face value, this is your basic popcorn film, designed as grand escapist entertainment. Director Sam Raimi, who helmed the popular Spider-Man film trilogy starring Tobey Maguire, checks all the requisite boxes as the action unfolds at a furious pace with eye-popping special effects. Parents are advised that the violence, though stylized, is intense and sometimes gory, and the language occasionally salty, meaning younger Marvel fans should stick to the comics.
Viewers unfamiliar with the Marvel canon and the interconnectivity of characters and plots will be hopelessly lost as the story, written by Michael Waldron, skips across said multiverse, alternative realities featuring familiar faces (and a boatload of cameos from previous Marvel films).
For the uninitiated, Dr. Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch), introduced in the eponymous 2016 film, is a neurosurgeon turned grand wizard, having been trained in the dark arts and the manipulation of the astral plane by the supreme sorcerer (and sidekick) Wong (Benedict Wong).
When we last saw the good doctor, he helped Peter Parker (Tom Holland) open the door to another dimension in the recent blockbuster “Spider-Man: No Way Home.”
Old habits die hard, as quickly revealed in “Multiverse of Madness.” But first there is a wedding: Strange’s ex-fiancee, Christine Palmer (Rachel McAdams), is getting hitched. The former lovers pledge mutual respect and happiness before a gigantic octopus descends, a la King Kong, on Manhattan.
Ah, but this is no ordinary cephalopod. It’s from another universe, and before it is vanquished by Strange and Wong, disgorges a hostage: a young woman named America Chavez (Xochitl Gomez). She has a special gift: the ability to travel at will through the multiverse. That means all the baddies are after her, including versions of Strange in other dimensions.
Among these is a familiar face: Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen), also known as the Scarlet Witch. She intends on using Chavez to take her power and travel to another universe where she can, surprisingly, live out her life as a single mother to two moppets, Billy (Julian Hilliard) and Tommy (Jeff Klyne).
But Marvel films are rarely so pro-family, and the wicked witch’s dream would wreak havoc across all universes. A titanic battle ensues halfway across the world between the forces of good (Strange) and evil (Maximoff), with Chavez as the prize.
Needless to say, the unexpected occurs, portals are opened and doppelgangers appear in droves. Strange comes face-to-face with a group of superheroes called the Illuminati, who may or may not be the next generation of Avengers.
“Multiverse of Madness” is awash in silliness and mumbo-jumbo, mixing sorcery, the occult and religious imagery. Sensible viewers will not take this seriously, but impressionable ones may need guidance that this is all harmless make-believe.
The film contains pervasive occult dialogue and action, some stylized violence, fleeting gory images and a handful of crude and profane terms. The Catholic News Service classification is A-III — adults. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG-13 — parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.
– – –
McAleer is a guest reviewer for Catholic News Service.
– – –
CAPSULE REVIEW
“Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness” (Disney)
The sequel to 2016’s “Doctor Strange” lives up to its name: a maddening, multidimensional, decidedly strange, if typically “Marvel”-ous movie based on the comic book series and directed by Sam Raimi. The neurosurgeon turned wizard (Benedict Cumberbatch) seeks to protect a young woman (Xochitl Gomez) who has the ability to travel at will across universes. A wicked witch (Elizabeth Olsen) wants her power, threatening global catastrophe. The film is awash in silliness and mumbo-jumbo, mixing sorcery, the occult and religious imagery. Sensible viewers will not take this seriously, but impressionable ones may need guidance that this is all harmless make-believe. Pervasive occult dialogue and action, some stylized violence, fleeting gory images, a handful of crude and profane terms. The Catholic News Service classification is A-III — adults. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG-13 — parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.
– – –
CLASSIFICATION
“Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness” (Disney) — Catholic News Service classification, A-III — adults. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG-13, parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.
Breaking the Spell: Oriental Exoticism and the Genesis of Doctor Strange
When Marvel Comics creators Stan Lee and Steve Ditko conceived of Doctor Strange in 1963, their goal was to produce cheap, disposable entertainment and little more. They could not foresee the lasting cultural impact of their world-building, nor that it would be written into the corporate DNA of a future entertainment empire. Indeed, when Messrs. Lee and Ditko created their master of the mystic arts for a 13-page back-up story in Marvel’s Strange Tales #110, they didn’t dwell upon the cultural stereotypes, oriental exoticism, and grift ingrained in their storytelling. Cultural awareness — let alone sensitivity— wasn’t the norm for comic book creators of their day. As such, concerns over misrepresentation simply didn’t come into play, and Doctor Strange would eventually join an older, larger narrative that makes magic somehow plausible while erasing the authenticity of one culture in order to entertain another.
For those unfamiliar with the comics, Dr. Stephen Strange— prior to his indoctrination into the mystic arts– was a gifted, if narcissistic, surgeon who at the peak of his career lost his ability to practice after a tragic car wreck severely injured his hands. Desperate to regain his skills and social standing, Strange squanders his wealth and resources on any hope of a cure. Desperate and mired in alcoholism, Strange travels to the far East chasing the rumor of the Ancient One, a Tibetan mystic who might possess the ability to restore Strange’s medical skills. Upon reaching Kamar-Taj, the Ancient One’s secret monastery, the wizened mystic confirms there is no cure for Strange’s injuries.
However, the Ancient One sees great potential in Strange and offers to school him in ancient magics if he agrees to forsake his selfish, materialistic ways and become a protector of the weak and innocent. Following an astoundingly brief period of study (frequently observed in those of a particular privilege tutored in the East), the mantle of Earth’s Sorcerer Supreme is bestowed upon Strange. Soon thereafter, Dr. Strange establishes his sanctum sanctorum nestled in New York’s Greenwich Village, where he protects humanity from those evil forces lurking in neighboring dark dimensions.
Western popular culture overflows with fantasy storytelling that serves to codify a distorted vision of Asian and Middle Eastern cultures. It’s a narrative that can be traced back to the early nineteenth century literary fads and theatrical frippery of the Spiritualist movement. History is sketchy regarding Spiritualism’s point of origin, but many historians credit the enigmatic Fox Sisters for sowing the seeds of the tenacious belief system; astounding followers with their ability to communicate with the dead via disembodied knocking and rapping. Even after middle sister Maggie confessed it was all a hoax in 1888, the Spiritualist movement continued to gain momentum. As for the Fox Sisters, they died penniless and maligned by a society that once celebrated them as harbingers of a new era.
In order to remain viable, Spiritualism needed to structure a doctrine beyond the cheap theatrics of mediums, mesmerists, and levitators, so occultists looked to the East for exploitable resources. Rising from the tide of well-heeled followers and society notables came former Russian aristocrat Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (1831-1891). “Blavatsky,” according to former Blondie bass guitarist and Fortean Times contributor Gary Lachman, “and the people around her, made some remarkable, often unbelievable, claims. For example, Blavatsky claimed to be able to manifest and command ‘elementals’, the sylphs, salamanders, gnomes, and undines of magical legend. She was also said to be able to manifest spirits of a more human type, at seances and other magical gatherings.” Foreshadowing Dr. Strange’s mentor, Blavatsky declared her occult powers came from the tutelage of a cadre of Tibetan mystics with whom she regularly convened upon an astral plane.
“The two best known of these enigmatic characters were called Morya and Koot Hoomi,” says Lachman. “It was at the Masters’ behest, Blavatsky said, that she was sent to the West to stop the modern world’s drift into materialism. To claim to have magical powers and to have entered Tibet was bad enough. To claim to have been sent into the modern world by mysterious Hindu Masters in order to battle with the repressive religion (Christianity) and a narrow-minded soulless science was, one has to admit, pushing it.”
In her lifetime, Blavatsky published numerous influential works on the occult including Isis Unveiled and founded the Theosophical Society in 1875—a world-wide organization with an active membership to this day. Indeed, many credit Blavatsky with the genesis of the New Age movement. Sadly, not unlike the Fox Sisters before her, Blavatsky would ultimately fall from grace. Shamed and diminished in the public eye after a report declared her a fraud (as well as a Russian spy), Blavatsky continued to publish her brand of anti-materialist, hybrid-Asian philosophy until her death, but discussion of her own superpowers and the influence of her Tibetan masters were absent from her later texts. Not so for the texts of Western popular culture, in fact, the Ancient Tibetan master trope remained viable and eventually wound its way into popular entertainment and the stories of Doctor Strange.
It wasn’t just narrative tropes that gave permission for cultural appropriation. Live performance and the Art of the Con further informed the identity of Marvel’s master of the mystic arts. As you might have surmised, much about the occult is performative and has always made for some lively theatre. Few performers were as influential to the imagery of Doctor Strange than Alexander the Crystal Seer AKA Alexander the Man Who Knows. Born Claude Alexander Conlin (1880-1954), the native South Dakotan was a latecomer to the supernatural trade but took note of the salesmanship of his predecessors and plied his mystical craft through sold-out performances and numerous best-selling books.
Clad in turban and flowing satin robes, Alexander claimed he was one of the few Westerners to master the yogic magic of Indian gurus and fakirs, a questionable scholarship he shared with Blavatsky. “Part of Alexander’s genius was to realize that his audiences would be more willing to explore that ambiguity if he associated his initiation into these powers with Oriental mystique,” says Chris Noto-Jones. “The chances were good that nobody in his audience had ever been to India or even met anyone from India; public information about India was heavily exoticized.”
Like Blavatsky before him, Alexander also fortified his brand through publication. “[M]y personal favorite is the 1924 title Oriental Wisdom, its Principals and Practice,” says Noto-Jones. “in which he explains how ‘the Orient has always been looked upon as the Great Fount of inner knowledge’ where discoveries about the nature of the mind and the universe have been made that have yet to be accounted for in Western science. That is, according to Alexander ‘Oriental Wisdom’ should not be seen as anti-scientific, but rather as a repository of science-in-waiting or not-yet-science —Oriental Wisdom was knowledge that looked like magic only for as long as it took scientists to understand and incorporate its principles and practices.” It is precisely this mystification of ancient knowledge that comprises the DNA of Doctor Strange and the volumes of exoticized imagery we consume without consideration for the damage it does to other cultures.
“Perhaps the greatest genius of his life’s performance is that it was such a successful commercial enterprise —a grand grift,” says Noto-Jones. “In the end, Alexander’s performance of ‘Oriental Magic’ became enmeshed in the sale of an entire counter-cultural worldview, which professed to expand the scientific world into new (and ancient) realms. One of the most important things I’ve learned, I think, is that these kinds of claims are easy in a cultural climate that already mystifies the Orient.”
The early 20th century delivered a colorful cabal of run-ups to Doctor Strange as White characters empowered with mystical abilities derived from a fabricated vision of the East became a staple of American popular entertainment. Every Sunday, Lee Falk’s Mandrake, the Magician arrived on the doorstep courtesy of the Sunday Funnies, Fred Guardineer’s Zatara could be found between the pages of Action Comics, and the airwaves were alive with the radio adventures of Chandu the Magician.
It is with Chandu that our magic carpet ride through the distorted history of oriental exotism begins its descent. Making his radio debut in 1931 from the Mutual Broadcasting System, Chandu the Magician was the creation of Henry Earnshaw, Vera Oldham, and RR Morgan. The series ran for six years before cancelation and saw resurrection in 1948, but not before it was realized for the silver screen in the 1932 Fox Film Corporation feature starring Edmund Lowe and Bela Lugosi in the role of Roxor, the evil magician. In 1934, Chandu would return to cinemas for a 12-part Sol Lesser movie serial in which Lugosi flipped from the villain’s role for that of Chandu himself.
Chandu’s backstory is more than a little familiar by this point. In the 1932 film’s opening sequence, we learn that after three years of study in a secret Southeast Asian Temple, Captain Frank Chandler has mastered the mystic arts in record time. Sayeth the Yogi: “In the years that thou hast dwelt among us, thou hast conquered the will of the spirits and thou hast found thy reward in the powers proclaimed by Shiva. Thou shalt look into the eyes of men and they shall be as straw in thy hands. Thou shalt cause them to see what is not there even unto a gathering of 12 times 12. My son, I proclaim thee one of the sacred company of the Yogi and bestow upon thee the name of Chandu…”
With a dramatic flip of his cape, Chandu proceeds to demonstrate his newly confirmed skills starting with the classic Indian rope trick. Upon willing the rope to stretch to the ceiling, a fellow yogi deftly shimmies up its length and disappears into darkness. Chandu then manifests an astral form that hovers above as he walks through a path of fire unscathed. Finally, the Yogi Master confirms Chandu’s training is complete and they can teach him no more. Chandu eventually returns to the West where he employs his mastery of black magic to right wrongs and rout evil at every turn.
Corroboration that Lee and Ditko took inspiration directly from Chandu is murky, but the circumstantial evidence abounds. Contrary to his customary bravado, upon the character’s debut, Lee bestowed much of the credit for Dr. Strange’s creation on Steve Ditko, stating in a 1963 Comics Reader interview, “Well, we have a new character in the works for Strange Tales (just a 5-page filler named Dr. Strange) Steve Ditko is gonna draw him. It has sort of a black magic theme.”
Evidently Lee didn’t harbor a great deal of faith in the character’s future. “The first story is nothing great, but perhaps we can make something of him—’twas Steve’s idea and I figured we’d give it a chance, although again, we had to rush the first one too much.”
Strange’s early stories were aimless, one-off tales about ghosts or haunted houses and offered little in the way of action, suspense, or emotional impact. The character was on the chopping block until Ditko convinced Lee to allow him to plot the stories. Thanks to his lengthy tenure in post-Comics Code comics like Strange Suspense Stories and The Thing!, Ditko knew his way around tales of magic and mysticism, as Noto-Jones notes: “Stephen Strange was part of a Ditko tradition that carried back to the 1950s; the glory-craving bastard whose journeys in a snow capped East led him to a comeuppance from a wise and ancient mystic.”
Doctor Strange’s debut struck a quieter chord with readers than his Marvel Comics predecessors, but he would ultimately amass a sturdy following… perhaps for reasons beyond the creators’ intent. “This series was indeed strange,” says Sean Howe in Marvel Comics, the Untold Story. “Steve Ditko contributed some of his most surrealistic work to the comic book and gave it a disorienting, hallucinogenic quality. Dr. Strange’s adventures take place in bizarre worlds and twisting dimensions that resemble a Salvador Dali painting. They involve mystical spells, trances, astral travel, and occult lore. Inspired by the pulp-fiction magicians of Stan Lee’s childhood as well as by the contemporary Beat culture, Dr. Strange remarkably predicted the youth counter culture’s fascination with Eastern mysticism and psychedelia.”
For over 58 years of publication, the Doctor Strange comic has amused and entertained, but it also helped to embed a counterproductive fascination with Eastern mysticism and diminish the authenticity of other cultures in the minds of readers. This is frequently the case with White privileged storytellers who see their job as catering to an audience with whom they share a common cultural background.
Considering the troubling history of Oriental exoticism from Blavatsky to Alexander and Chandu, film studios now have a golden opportunity to retool the narrative. The Doctor Strange film took several progressive steps forward by offering audiences a reality inspired by culturally authentic characterization, design, location, not to mention the brilliant casting of artists of color like Chiwetel Ejiofor as Baron Mordo and Benedict Wong as Wong. Representation and equity, even in a fantasy context, matters more than words can say. Sadly, the film’s credibility was knocked back several paces thanks to the confounding whitewashing of the Ancient One with the casting of Tilda Swinton in the role— a studio blunder deserving of its own lengthy exploration.
Messrs. Lee and Ditko never anticipated the scrutiny their creations might one day face, nor how their ideas would impact the future of popular culture. In their stories, Lee and Ditko invoked a long tradition of toxic alchemy to create Doctor Strange’s world, a world we now seek to cast anew. It’s time for ardent fans of the medium, indeed fans of Doctor Strange in particular, to take a look back at the character’s racist genesis and explore how we can amend the narrative going forward. As contemporary storytellers seek to shed old narratives steeped in Oriental exoticism it behooves fans of comics and film to scrutinize the backstory of properties like Doctor Strange so we may foster the kind of cultural agency and authenticity we all deserve.
(A tremendous thank you to Jim Jewell for his editorial assistance and insight.)
Neutral—I have watched every Marvel TV show, movie… etc. And this is the first one I felt a bit uncomfy with. I realize Doctor Strange himself uses “magic.” But it always felt more like a fantasy sort of magic.
But in this movie Wanda (aka Scarlett Witch) uses the Dark Hold (a book for evil spells) to send a demon and other evil beings to chase down a new character we are introduced to named America Chavez. And given Wanda’s power make her glow red, it seems fitting given she comes off as evil. Her spells seem WAY more grounded and close to that I have seen of satanists. Including a symbol that looks almost exactly like a pentagram near the end.
Again, I accept Strange and his spells because you never think of satanists or witchcraft. It’s fantastical in nature. But Wanda’s is WAY to close to actual witchcraft/satanist stuff.
Normally I would take my family to see it, including my parents. But I don’t think they are going to like the more witchcrafty/devily feel of it. If you have kids, I wouldn’t recommend they see it as they are way to impressionable, this movie does a good job at it.
Now if that wasn’t bad enough. America Chavez actress is a LGBT actress. And in the movie you briefly see her with her “parents’… two women. The whole planets lore is it’s a universe where only woman exists. Have no idea how babies are made, but that’s not the point really.
It’s shame because I love Strange and Wanda. And the worst thing about all this is this movie is VERY important to some big changes in the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe). So if you miss it, you will miss out on a ton of important info regarding the multiverse.
My Ratings: Moral rating: Very Offensive / Moviemaking quality: 5